Docketodds.
All cases

Will the court affirm in full on lead appeal 26-3709?

AbbVie Inc., et al. v. Brown, et al.

Administrative law · US Court of Appeals · Ninth Circuit · No. 26-3709 · Argument scheduled

The case, in plain English.

AbbVie and other drugmakers challenged a Washington law limiting restrictions on supplying discounted medicines to eligible healthcare providers and their partner pharmacies. The law concerns the federal 340B discount program. A judge refused to pause enforcement, and the companies are appealing.

Why it matters

The immediate dispute is whether Washington's supply rules remain enforceable while the lawsuits continue.

Will the court affirm in full on lead appeal 26-3709?

From bet to decision

  1. Place a simulated betCloses 1 Dec 2026, 11:00 AEDT (Sydney)

    Your odds are locked when your simulated bet is accepted.

  2. Oral argument2026-12-01

    Argument scheduled

  3. Court decisionDate not announced

    The betting deadline is not the Court’s decision date.

  4. Bet settlementAfter outcome review

    The official outcome is checked against the rules. Winning bets pay out; void bets return your stake.

Read the settlement rules

What informs the forecast?

Historical baseline: 57.9% full affirmance among 7700 argued merits appeals in the same circuit and broad case category. This is an experimental starting price, not a case-specific assessment of the briefs or judges. It is conditional on a qualifying merits decision; procedural endings return stakes. Its accuracy on this selected catalogue has not been established.

Historical sample and calculation: FY2016–2025 argued civil merits appeals, pooled within circuit; excludes prisoner categories. The historical cohort is broader than this selected catalogue.

Lead appeal: 26-3709. Related appeals in this package: 26-3712, 26-3714. Judgment expiry: 27 Sept 2027, 12:30 AEST (Sydney).

Forecast provenance

Model: FJC circuit civil baseline FY2016–2025. Generated: 2026-09-27T02:30:00.000Z. Target: full affirmance on the lead appeal. Feature snapshot SHA-256: 5537e577a91c3d7f258f115fe1ac2cf3988263261e62047702ad64bba02c0379.

What could change the view

No case-specific adjustment has been made to the circuit baseline. New materials may require suspension and further review.

Model-derived probabilities are uncertain, not guarantees. Historical backtests do not establish live accuracy. Prices use reciprocal probabilities with no added margin; two-decimal rounding may slightly affect implied totals.

Outcome & resolution rules

YES if the first merits judgment issued after this market opens affirms in full the judgment or order under review on the named lead appeal. NO if that judgment reverses or vacates any part of that judgment or order, including an affirmed-in-part/reversed-in-part result. A remand alone is not enough: classify the accompanying disposition. Dismissal of the appeal, withdrawal, settlement, mootness, denial of jurisdiction, an equally divided court, or a disposition that cannot be classified is VOID and returns stakes. Related docket numbers listed on this page identify the same case package; they are not additional independent markets. If a combined judgment does not identify the disposition of the named lead appeal, the result is VOID. Later rehearing, mandate or further proceedings do not reopen settlement. If no qualifying judgment issues within 365 days of this market opening, the market is VOID. Two separate reviewers must verify the official judgment and docket before settlement. Market opens 2026-09-27T02:30:00.000Z; judgment expiry 2027-09-27T02:30:00.000Z. Lead appeal: 26-3709.

This is an appellate disposition market on the named lead docket. Mixed merits dispositions resolve NO; procedural terminations resolve VOID. The selection deadline closes betting before argument and is separate from the judgment-expiry date stated in the rules.

Deadline: 1 Dec 2026, 11:00 AEDT (Sydney). Market rule revision 1. Accepted bets retain this version. Only a reviewed official outcome can settle this market.